“Now heaven be thanked, a few brave drops were ours.”

Today, dear readers, is the 100th anniversary of the official US entrance into the First World War.

I say official, because the US had been involved in the war from the very beginning, sending arms to both the Allies and the Central Powers, attempting to make diplomatic incursions that would end hostilities, and delivering food to refugees in Belgium and elsewhere.  Nevertheless, the American government was aware that a significant percentage of the voting public were immigrants–German immigrants, who still had strong ties to their homeland; Irish immigrants whose opinions about Britain were not high, especially after the failure of the Easter Rising in 1916; Scandinavian immigrants whose families had suffered as a result Russian imperial rule.  Though the war itself was far from America’s shores, it was very close to many Americans hearts.

In 1915, Woodrow Wilson’s campaign hinged on the fact that he hadn’t gotten the US involved in the war (in a very strict military sense).  But a combination of events in 1917 spelled the end of American “neutrality”, and launched the war that would change American engagement in the world forever.

The Russian Revolution, which began in March, had forced the Tzar Nicholas II to abdicate, and put a form of representative government in charge of the Russian Empire.  For Wilson, who had often publicly denounced monarchical rule in general, and the 300-year-old Romanov Dynasty in particular, having a representative government in place made it easier for the US to make overtures to Russia–also, his very very strong desire to ensure that the country didn’t fall into the hands of Socialists or Communists made him very eager to make as many overtures, offers of help, and assistance as possible.  Furthermore, the increasingly hostile practices of the German Navy, particularly its submarines, had, for some times, turned American favor against the German Army.  For the record, the sinking of the Lusitania was not the reason the US got involved in the war.  The Lusitania sank in 1915.  And people weren’t happy about it, but they weren’t willing to risk their children’s lives because of it.  Not by a long shot.

Finally, it was becoming clear, even by 1917, that the alliance between Imperial Germany and Austria-Hungary, the alliance that made up the Central Powers, were not doing well.  They were–and had been–considerably outnumbered, and the British blockade of German ports meant that people on the German home-front were beginning, quite literally, to starve.  American imports to Germany had dropped considerably over time, and the resultant increase in imports to the Allies (largely comprised of Great Britain, France, and Russia), had helped considerably in terms of feeding the troops.

In early 1917, Germany decided to resume all-out submarine warfare on every commercial ship headed toward Britain again (they had employed and revoked the policy several times over the course of the war).  They also sent what we now call “The Zimmerman Telegram” to Mexico, stating that if Mexico allied with Germany and declared war on the United States, Germany would help Mexico reclaim the land it had lost when Texas succeeded.  The German diplomat who allegedly sent the telegram, was Zimmerman.  There is still debate in some quarters as to whether the telegram was sent in good faith or if Germany, who knew its telegram lines were being monitored by the Allies, knowingly attempted to provoke the United States into declaring war in a rather badly judged act of hubris.

Either way, using the Zimmerman Telegram as proof of Germany’s claims on US territory, Woodrow Wilson went to Congress on April 4 and requested a declaration of war against Imperial Germany and its Allies.  On April 6, that declaration was formally made.

Though, as I noted, Germany would almost certainly have had to admit defeat regardless of the US intervention, the influx of some 1 million US soldiers and all their weaponry and, perhaps most importantly, all their food, certainly tipped the scales in the Allies favor.  The US Army was only involved in a few battles in 1918, since it took some considerable time to organize and train 1 million men….Americans, however, had been involved in the war via the French Legion, the Red Cross, the British Army, which permitted foreign pilots to enlist, and other organizations, from the war’s outset.

So while the war itself was perhaps not a watershed event for the US, the aftermath definitely was.  Woodrow Wilson (declared that he alone) was in charge of the Peace Treaty that ended with the Treaty of Versailles.  His policies (and phenomenal blunders), along with the fury of the British and French diplomats, who had lost land, their health, their children, and their fortunes, combined, essentially, to create the world that we have today.  The modern Middle East was created as a result of the Treaty of Versailles.  The Russian government (which did indeed become Socialist/Communist in the end of 1917) was barred from the Peace Talks, informally launching the Cold War that…from which we seem to have not yet escaped.  The US made huge loans to both the Allied and Central Powers during the war, and when the US went off the common gold standard after the war, it put each indebted nation even that much further in debt as a result, leading to the rise of America as a world power.

But, 100 years ago, that was all in the future.  100 years ago today, men and women were preparing to sail across the ocean to a land many had never before seen, to be part of a cause that was nebulous, at best.  And today, we remember them, and the legacy they left, not only to us, but to the world.

A young Alan Seeger

Alan Seeger, a midwesterner who had attended Harvard, had been serving with the French Foreign Legion years before the US involvement with the war.  In 1916, just before his death, he wrote a poem to commemorate his fallen comrades.  Lines from that poem are carved into the Memorial to American Volunteers, at Place des États-Unis, Paris (the artist used Seeger himself as a model for the soldier).  Today, we share a bit of that poem with you, as a way to commemorate what began today, and to ponder where it yet may lead.

The Memorial to American Volunteers

Ode in Memory of the American Volunteers Fallen for France

By Alan Seeger

IV.
O friends! I know not since that war began
From which no people nobly stands aloof
If in all moments we have given proof
Of virtues that were thought American.
I know not if in all things done and said
All has been well and good,
Or of each one of us can hold his head
As proudly as he should,
Or, from the pattern of those mighty dead
Whose shades our country venerates to-day,
If we ‘ve not somewhat fallen and somewhat gone astray,
But you to whom our land’s good name is dear,
If there be any here
Who wonder if her manhood be decreased,
Relaxed its sinews and its blood less red
Than that at Shiloh and Antietam shed,
Be proud of these, have joy in this at least,
And cry: Now heaven be praised
That in that hour that most imperilled her,
Menaced her liberty who foremost raised
Europe’s bright flag of freedom, some there were
Who, not unmindful of the antique debt,
Came back the generous path of Lafayette;
And when of a most formidable foe
She checked each onset, arduous to stem—
Foiled and frustrated them—
On those red fields where blow with furious blow
Was countered, whether the gigantic fray
Rolled by the Meuse or at the Bois Sabot,
Accents of ours were in the fierce mêlée;
And on those furthest rims of hallowed ground
Where the forlorn, the gallant charge expires,
When the slain bugler has long ceased to sound,
And on the tangled wires
The last wild rally staggers, crumbles, stops,
Withered beneath the shrapnel’s iron showers:—
Now heaven be thanked, we gave a few brave drops;
Now heaven be thanked, a few brave drops were ours.’
                                         V
There, holding still, in frozen steadfastness,
Their bayonets toward the beckoning frontiers,
They lie—our comrades—lie among their peers,
Clad in the glory of fallen warriors,
Grim clustered under thorny trellises,
Dry, furthest foam upon disastrous shores,
Leaves that made last year beautiful, still strewn
Even as they fell, unchanged, beneath the changing moon;
And earth in her divine indifference
Rolls on, and many paltry things and mean
Prate to be heard and caper to be seen.
But they are silent, clam; their eloquence
Is that incomparable attitude;
No human presences their witness are,
But summer clouds and sunset crimson-hued,
And showers and night winds and the northern star
Nay, even our salutations seem profane,
Opposed to their Elysian quietude;
Our salutations calling from afar,
From our ignobler plane
And undistinction of our lesser parts:
Hail, brothers, and farewell; you are twice blest, brave hearts.
Double your glory is who perished thus,
For you have died for France and vindicated us.

The Baileys Women’s Prize For Fiction Shortlist is Here!

Yesterday, the lovely committee in charge of choosing this years’ Baileys Women’s Prize for Fiction announced their short list.  These are the six books chosen out of the sixteen originally nominated, and one of them will be this years’ Baileys Women’s Prize winner June 7, 2017.

From http://www.womensprizeforfiction.co.uk/

These book represent an enormous range of settings, from 19th century Kentucky to 1980s Nigeria, and a post-WWII sanatorium, Some give voices to the politically marginalized and historically overlooked, like Thein does in her stunning Do Not Say We Having Nothing, while use their characters identities to turn the world as we know it on its ear, as Alderman does in The Power (when you have a chance to read it, you’ll understand precisely what I am saying).    They also represent a great range of experience–Stay With Me is Ayọ̀bámi Adébáyọ̀̀’s debut novel, while Linda Grant won the Women’s Prize for Fiction in 2000.

“It has been a great privilege to Chair the Baileys Women’s Prize for Fiction in a year which has proved exceptional for writing of both quality and originality,” said Tessa Ross, 2017 Chair of Judges. “It was therefore quite a challenge to whittle this fantastic longlist of 16 books down to only six… These were the six novels that stayed with all of us well beyond the final page.”

And just a reminder, the winner of the award takes home a £30,000 prize, as well as a ‘Bessie’ – a limited edition bronze statue – created by artist Grizel Niven (an extra limited edition, as this is Baileys last year sponsoring the prize).

The shortlisted books are as follows:

Stay With Me Ayọ̀bámi Adébáyọ̀̀
The Power  Naomi Alderman (Will be released October 10)
The Dark Circle by Linda Grant (Will be released June 29)
The Sport of Kings by C.E. Morgan
First Love by Gwendoline Riley
Do Not Say We Have Nothing by Madeleine Thien

I don’t know about you, but I can’t wait to get started on each of these nominated novels–and you can be sure we’ll be announcing the winner after the announcement on June 7, dear readers!

The Romance Garden!

Look!  I found actual flowers!  It’s like it’s spring or something!

Yesterday was the first day of baseball season, dear readers, which, as far as I’m concerned, means that it’s spring, regardless of whether there is still a snow bank at the end of my driveway.

So, as you begin to think about your own gardens, about the pansies and the forsythia that will grace your pots, about the crocuses popping up through the winter-hard soil, and about the beautiful colors that will be gracing our gardens in a few months’ time, why not come in and check out the romances gracing our shelves?

Because, as we say here, every mind needs a little dirt in which to grow….

The Artist’s Wife (Périe, 1849–1887) Reading
by Albert Bartholome

Bridget: A Lady’s Code of Misconduct by Meredith Duran

I love Meredith Duran’s books.  I love that she picks historic time periods or themes that most writers wouldn’t touch.  I love that her heroines are tough as iron, and I love that her heroes aren’t macho stereotypes.  And this book reminded me just what a terrific romance writer she is.

Facing an unwanted marriage that will rob her of her fortune (and, most likely, her sanity), Jane Mason no longer cares about her reputation.  Desperate to get as far away from her past as possible, she strikes a bargain with the most notorious man she knows–a politician with a bright future, but a dark reputation.  Crispin Burke learned the hard way not to let down his guard around anyone.  He agrees to Jane’s scheme, knowing that he simply can’t get hurt.  But when Crispin’s whole world get turned on upside down, Jane may be the only person left who can save him.

For all the high stakes in this description, there is a lot of humor in this book; Crispin himself is a brilliant young man, and the banter between him and the quick-witted Jane are delightful.  More than anything though, I loved that the emphasis of this book was on trust, and how important trust is to true love.  Though this lush and lovely novel is the fifth in Duran’s Rules of the Reckless series, this is a perfect place for newcomers to start reading.

KelleyFalling for the Highlander by Lynsay Sands

When Lady Murine Carmichael runs away after her brother tries to trade her for horses, the last thing she expects is to be rescued by and fall in love with the man who refused to take her as payment, but that’s just what happens in this delightful Highland romance that’s as sweet as it is funny. Although the threat to Murine from her family  is complicated, the relationship between her and Dougall Buchanan isn’t. Dougall admires Murine’s bravery, and Murine immediately trusts Dougall to keep her safe. Dougall never questions that he wants to be with Murine, but his quiet hesitation as he figures out just how to pursue her respectfully and with care makes him an easy hero to fall in love with. As to Murine, her bravery is underscored by her unsurety when it comes to being in a relationship. She knows what she wants, but her quiet surprise at the discovery adds depth to her already enjoyable character.

Falling for the Highlander is the fourth in Sands’ “Scottish Highlanders” series, and not knowing that at the outset, I still had no trouble beginning here. If you’re looking for a romance with characters you won’t hesitate to root for from the start, you won’t regret an afternoon spent with Murine and Dougall.

Until next month, beloved patrons, happy reading!
Henri Matisse, Reader on a Black Background, 1939

Saturdays @ the South: When you just don’t have the time

Not everyone is a reader (for those of you clutching your pearls or gasping, please breathe). It took me a very long time to understand this concept. Books have been a part of my life from birth. They comprise some of my earliest memories to the point where I cannot remember a time when I wasn’t reading. Friendships have been forged on the common like/dislike of books. But this isn’t the path for everyone.

Some people do not read, and this is a valid life choice. That’s why the library offers DVDs or programs and many other offerings for people who don’t find reading to be particularly their bag. But increasingly, I’ve spoken with many people who want to read more, but can’t find the time. This is completely understandable. Busyness seems more inherent in daily life, and let’s face it, sitting down to read can feel like a commitment, maybe even homework if you’re reading something you don’t enjoy. But reading doesn’t have to be a huge commitment. It can be captured in the drips and drabs of those elusive bits of free time. For those of you who are looking to beef up their reading lives, or are looking to incorporate books into your life, I have a few suggestions.

There are plenty of articles that offer ways to make the most of your reading time. Many of their points I agree with. Some seem a bit gimmicky to me. So in the spirit of librarianship, I thought I’d curate the six tips I find most practical in a digestible format. For those of you who are loyal readers, you can probably guess what’s coming next. Yup, I’ve put together an infographic for you (click on it for a larger image you can expand)!

These particular tips are tried-and-true for me. I’ve incorporated reading into my daily routine and while I haven’t put it specifically on my calendar, I do find time in my day that I carve out specifically for reading. The one thing that I think surprises most people is the encouragement not to finish a book. Some people are dead against this, but I found my reading life to be so much freer when I allowed myself to put down a book I wasn’t enjoying  and pick up something that enticed me more. This doesn’t mean never, ever go back to it. Maybe make a mental note to return to it when you have the headspace for that particular story. But why force yourself?

Audiobooks are pretty well celebrated here on the blog, and for good reason, but that doesn’t mean that every audiobook is for every person, so if you’re trying to read more and would like to give audiobooks a try,  know that some people prefer listening to a certain type of book or narrator that can engage them in the story. Be prepared to experiment!

All of these are tips that can hopefully help people get back on track with their reading lives (or perhaps even start one!), but please remember that the library is here for you for more tips and to help you find that un-put-downable book or that audiobook narrator that’s hits your listening sweet spot.  Till next week, dear readers, let us know what you want to get out of your reading life. You can be sure that we’ll do everything we can to help!